Category Archives: 1970s,, pensions, pension law, fairness, workers’ rights, women lawyers

Hollywood’s take on unwanted pregnancies

The current turmoil over abortion rights arose after the U.S. Supreme Court reversed Roe v. Wade two years ago.  But the problems created by unwanted pregnancies have been around for generations, since long before Roe v. Wade made legal abortions possible in the U.S. in 1973. 

A Place in the Sun was a powerful 1951 Hollywood film highlighting the problem. Starring Montgomery Clift and Ellizabeth Taylor, the film featured Shelley Winters as a hapless young woman whose unwanted pregnancy led to disastrous consequences. Based on the Theodore Dreiser novel An American Tragedy, the film dramatized a real-life story dating back to 1906.  I’ve watched this film many times, and although I felt sympathy for Shelley Winters’s pathetic character, I never related to her.

A much later Hollywood film openly dealt with the subject of abortion in 1963.  Love With the Proper Stranger featured two Hollywood superstars during that era, Natalie Wood and Steve McQueen (both of whom coincidentally met untimely deaths in 1980/81).  It became a huge box-office hit in 1963, and it’s worth revisiting today.  

In the film, Natalie Wood (as “Angela”) and Steve McQueen (as “Rocky”) confront the abortion question head-on.  Rocky is a jazz musician seeking a gig at a union hiring hall in NYC when Angela suddenly appears.  Steve McQueen had just starred in The Great Escape and a bunch of popular Western films, but he reportedly wanted to play a different kind of character in a different kind of film.  Natalie Wood’s career was thriving, and she probably relished playing a sharp young woman who boldly chooses to confront the one-night stand who’s caused her a serious problem—an unwanted pregnancy.

Angela’s life is constrained by her oppressive family. She’s “choking to death” in their small apartment, constantly vowing to escape. Now, unhappily pregnant, she tells Rocky, “All I want from you is a doctor.”

After some hesitation, Rocky tracks down the name of a doctor who charges $400 for an abortion, and he agrees to pay half.  The two of them arrive at the location where they’ve been told to bring the money, but the lowlife they meet demands another $50.  (Please note: Angela is wearing a dress and high-heeled shoes, an outfit that looks absurd when viewed today. This is what Hollywood moguls must have thought women wore to their illegal abortions in the 1960s.)

The couple has scraped up the original $400 fee with difficulty, so they resort to getting the extra $50 from Rocky’s family. They finally make their way to the doctor’s address, a run-down apartment where Angela shakily begins to undress.  But the abortionist is a not an MD, just a rude woman with scary-looking things in a suitcase.  Angela is shocked and begins to sob, fearful of what might happen to her.  Rocky bursts in, and they escape together, Rocky bravely announcing “I’ll kill them before I let them touch you.”

Their budding romance has its ups and downs as they deal with Angela’s family and a prospective suitor her mother pushes on her.  But Rocky finally realizes that he loves Angela, and he asks her to marry him.  Thus we have a typical Hollywood “happy ending.”  Except that this couple has shared a horrific run-in with the illegal abortion industry that existed in NYC in 1963. 

Love With the Proper Stranger offered a cautionary tale for its audience, including a young woman like me.  When I saw this movie, I was a naïve student hovering between college and law school. Although I was dating a variety of suitors, I wasn’t as sexually active as many other women my age. (I was what we called a “good girl”.)  Still, I could easily see myself in Angela’s appalling situation, confronting an unwanted pregnancy sometime in the future.  And it certainly struck me as unfair that it was the woman who had to deal with this situation while her partner could escape without any consequences.

Four years later, I graduated from law school with the goal of helping minorities and women achieve the justice often denied them in the U.S. at that time.  So when I began work in a job that enabled me to challenge the constitutionality of the restrictive Illinois abortion statute, I seized the opportunity to effect change and, with my co-counsel, took on that challenge.

Did seeing the film, Love With the Proper Stranger, influence me in any way?  Specifically, did it influence me to become a lawyer who challenged that restrictive law? 

Maybe.

In retrospect, I think I was influenced by a great many things in our culture.  Including Hollywood movies.

A much more recent movie similarly addresses the deplorable absence of abortion rights in 1963:  The 2021 French film, Happening, based on the 2000 novel with the same title by the 2022 Nobel Prize-winner in literature, Annie Ernaux.  Ernaux’s novel, and the film adapted from it, dramatize the real-life experiences she endured (coincidentally in 1963) when, as a promising young college student, she was faced with an unwanted pregnancy.  Both the film and the book depict her repeated attempts to secure a safe abortion, thwarted by the harsh anti-abortion law governing French women at that time. 

Happening is a far more sophisticated version of this story than the 1963 U.S. version. It garnered outstanding reviews by prominent film critics worldwide. Anyone viewing it lives through exactly what women at every level in French society confronted when they tried to live a meaningful life free from the cruel and antiquated views of abortion by those in leadership positions in the French government. 

Like the story in Love With the Proper Stranger, it’s a story as vivid to us today as it was to those of us who fought against the harsh laws depriving women of their reproductive freedom in the past.  In 2024, we must vow to re-fight those fights whenever and wherever our reproductive rights are denied.

A Remarkable Friend

This is a brief tribute to a remarkable friend, Karen Ferguson, who died last month.  You can read more about her life in the following obits:

New York Times https://www.nytimes.com/2021/12/30/business/retirement/karen-ferguson-dead.html
Washington Post  https://www.washingtonpost.com/obituaries/2021/12/29/pension-rights-karen-ferguson-dies/

Why was Karen remarkable? As the Times noted, she was “a Nader Raider, one of a legion of young public-interest lawyers who flocked to Washington” in the 1970s to work for Ralph Nader, the consumer advocate who was at that time a heroic figure on the American political scene.  She chose to devote herself to working on pension law, an “unglamorous-sounding subject” that was actually full of human drama, where she was able to champion workers’ rights and effect enormous changes to benefit their future.

I met Karen and became her lifelong friend when we were both students at Harvard Law School in the 1960s.  I had just moved into Wyeth Hall, the women’s dorm, during my first year, and the delightful Karen Willner was in her third year.  Karen’s warmth immediately enveloped me, a lowly 1L. Happily for me, we stayed in touch after she graduated.

While I was finishing my three years at HLS, Karen married John Ferguson, who decided to attend the University of Chicago Law School, and together they headed for Chicago.  Karen wrote to tell me that she’d begun working at a downtown Chicago law firm, where she was the first and only woman lawyer. 

During my third year of law school, I actually interviewed with that firm.  Disillusioned with the D.C. of Richard Nixon (my original destination), I was thinking about returning to Chicago, my home town.  Although I hoped to get a clerkship with a federal judge, I also interviewed with several Chicago law firms.  After chatting for a while, the recruiter for Karen’s firm told me outright, “We just hired our first woman, and we’re waiting to see how she works out before we hire another one.”  (This interview took place after passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and the recruiter was violating federal law when he said that.)  I’ve told this story many times, to the amazement of most listeners, and I like to add that I knew who that “first woman” was:  Karen.

When I returned to Chicago, I began working for U.S. District Judge Julius J. Hoffman [please see “Hangin’ with Judge Hoffman,” a ten-post series beginning at https://susanjustwrites.com/2020/11/13/hangin-with-judge-hoffman/].  With both of us living and working in Chicago, Karen and I enthusiastically resumed our friendship.  Because John was busy with his law school studies, Karen and I saw each other many times in downtown Chicago.  And one memorable evening, Karen, John, and I went together to see “The Yellow Submarine” at a downtown movie theater. 

I was sad when Karen and John departed for D.C. after he finished law school (and began his career as an NLRB attorney).  But their departure led to Karen’s groundbreaking new chapter in her life as a lawyer:  her launch into helping people by reforming pension law, with fairness as her first priority. 

We managed to stay in close touch during the many years that followed.  My memory-bank is filled with happy memories of our long friendship, including wonderful times spent together in both D.C. and Chicago.

I loved following Karen’s career, deeply enmeshed in working on pension-reform legislation, including the Retirement Equity Act of 1984, signed into law by President Reagan, and the Butch Lewis Act, signed into law last year by President Biden.  I reviewed her excellent book, Pensions in Crisis (original title: The Pension Book).  My glowing reviews appeared in the Chicago Daily Law Bulletin on January 25, 1996, and the Chicago Tribune on May 13, 1996 (“Pension Problems Come Alive, Along with Practical Guidance”).

Karen’s never-failing efforts to establish a secure and adequate retirement system, on top of expanded Social Security, are still under discussion on Capitol Hill. 

I also loved learning about the wonderful family she and John created, including her son, Andrew Ferguson, a lawyer, writer, and law professor at American University, and his wife and children.  My review and discussion of Andrew’s important book, Why Jury Duty Matters, appeared on this blog in April 2013. [Please see https://susanjustwrites.com/2013/04/03/does-jury-duty-matter/%5D

One more thing:  When I wrote my first novel, A Quicker Blood (published in 2009), I named my protagonist, a young woman lawyer, “Karen.”  I later brought her back as the protagonist in my third novel, Red Diana (published in 2018).  Was I thinking of my friend Karen when I chose that name?  I was. And all of the current nonsense focused on the name “Karen” infuriates me.  Although there may be a few women with that name who have acted inappropriately toward others, it’s totally unwarranted to pigeonhole all Karens that way.  Just think of Karen Ferguson and all that she’s done to make the lives of hard-working Americans more secure.  That’s in addition to her being a delightful human being, beloved by everyone who knew her.

In short, I was supremely lucky to know Karen Ferguson and to call her my friend for over five decades.  I’ve lost—indeed, we’ve all lost–one of the very best people on Planet Earth.