Category Archives: hiking

How nature “nurtures”: Research confirms what we’ve always known

“How Nature Nurtures,” a story appearing in the Summer 2026 issue of National Wildlife magazine, sets forth a whole lot of research studies, both old and new, that confirm what we’ve always known:  Exposure to nature makes people feel better.

This story, written by Katarina Zimmer, highlights one of the most recent studies, conducted by neuroscientist Sonja Sudimac and her colleagues in Berlin’s Grunewald Forest.   After spending an hour strolling through the trees, 32 participants were rushed to the researchers’ nearby lab at the Max Planck Institute for Human Development.  They lay down in a functional MRI machine that analyzed their brain activity.  The question: Had the nature walk affected their brains?

The scientists were most interested in the amygdala, the part of the brain that processes fear or stress and can trigger the body’s fight-or-flight response.  Inside the scanner, participants were shown images of scared human faces.  Those images would normally provoke activity in the amygdala.  The result?  Participants’ amygdalae were much less reactive after the forest walk than during tests conducted beforehand.  Even more significantly, another group of 31 who had walked along a busy street showed no difference in their brain activity before and after their walk.

The researchers concluded that walking in the forest made people feel less prone to stress. (2022 report in Molecular Psychiatry)

Author Zimmer goes on to note other studies, including the 2025 study by Mathew White of the University of Vienna where, much like the one in Berlin, participants lay in an MRI scanner. But here they watched imagery of a greenery-surrounded lake, a city, or an office while they received mild electric shocks. People reported that the pain was less severe when they watched the natural scene. White concluded that, because of the scenes of greenery, people “weren’t aware of the pain…to the same level.”

Many scientists look to the “stress reduction theory” proposed by Roger Ulrich in 1991 to explain some of nature’s health-boosting effects.  Non-threatening natural environments, like forests, please and relax us, lowering our heart rate and blood pressure, making us better at handling stress-provoking situations.  Reduced stress, in turn, lowers the risk of stress-triggered diseases and mental health problems.

Another theory goes back to the 1980s, when Rachel and Stephen Kaplan conceived the “attention restoration theory,” the idea that nature gives our overloaded brains a break.  Other researchers have linked nature exposure to greater satisfaction with our social lives, not only because we may spend time outdoors with other people but also because it puts us in a better mood when we later spend time with family and friends.  A 2025 study of Canadian university students reported that when they felt connected to the natural world, they felt less lonely in nature even when they were outdoors by themselves.  Terry Hartig of Sweden’s Uppsala University thinks the natural world, or features of it like animal life or certain trees or plants, almost take on the quality of a “social partner.” (Health and Place)

Even our immune systems may get a boost. In a 2024 study of over 1,000 U.S. adults, those who spent more time in nature had lower blood concentrations of C-reactive protein, a sign of inflammation that can give rise to chronic diseases and other health issues. (Brain, Behavior, and Immunity) A possible reason: Kendra Wilson, a social psychologist at Ohio State speculates that natural environments expose us to beneficial bacteria that contribute to healthy microbe communities in our guts and on our skin, thereby reducing inflammation.

Research also shows that feeling safe in the natural world is important.  Because it’s one of the strongest predictors of health benefits, people may get bigger health boosts from landscaped environments like parks than they do from wilder areas that they view as dangerous.

The focus today is on bringing more nature into cities in the form of parks, community gardens, and other greenery. People in many city neighborhoods, especially marginalized communities, don’t have access to green spaces. Nooshin Razani, a pediatrician and researcher at the University of California, San Francisco, analyzed nearly 50,000 children and teenagers across the U.S. and found that nearly a quarter lived in neighborhoods that lacked parks. Published in 2020 in Preventive Medicine, her study found this was especially true in nonwhite and low-income families. Razani hopes that, to address this gap, physicians will increasingly connect their patients to nature through partnerships with parks. She has already put this goal into action in Oakland, California, where she and her colleagues organize monthly bus outings for families who might otherwise have limited access to parks.

As researcher Sudimac concludes, these research findings are more important today than ever, when more than half the world’s population lives in cities and 70 percent is predicted to live in cities by 2050.  Along with our indoor, on-screen lifestyles, this unequal access to nature may be contributing to the rise of mental health problems like anxiety and depression.

All of this research confirms what we already knew: Protecting and expanding the nature around us is a priority.  Protecting the environment has always been a priority for some of us. It now appears to be even more of a priority for human health for every one of us.

As author Zimmer concludes, “If we nurture nature, nature can help us heal, too.”

Let’s be scent-sible

While I try to ignore the stench dominating the news from our nation’s capital, I’ve decided to focus on some of the more positive scents that dominate in the rest of our world. 

Here’s a story about “scents” I came across in the winter issue of National Parks, a magazine devoted to protecting America’s national parks and public lands.

Author Maggie Downs likes to hike through our now-sadly-endangered national parks, beginning her story with a hike through Arches National Park, where “the air is alive” with scents like the crisp aroma of pines and junipers.  She notes that these scents are different from those in Joshua Tree National Park, where desert aromas permeate the air.

Downs goes on to describe the scents that connect her to each destination she explores, highlighting the significance of scents.  Flowers, for example, rely on fragrance to lure pollinators, while predators like wolves use scent to mark territories, find mates, and track prey.

But Downs worries that many national park “scentscapes” are under threat because of climate change and pollution.  Although we have long treasured our parks for their beauty and their quiet, their “vital aromas” haven’t gotten the same level of protection.   

Will Rice, a professor at the University of Montana, has studied how natural smells are increasingly relevant to tourists in our national parks.  These natural smells “play a key role in what grounds us to a place,” he says.  “Scent…plays a role” in visitors’ strong attachment to the parks,” he adds.  “National parks are places where you can smell natural smells, and that’s increasingly difficult [to find] in a developing and industrial world.”

Maggie Downs adds, “Unfortunately, climate change is already affecting scentscapes…. It threatens native plant species with drought and wildfires, and it disrupts blooming scents, which throws plants and pollinators out of sync.”  She notes that “flowering plants are losing their fragrance,” and air pollution can mask natural scents.

We can’t be sure about the future impact of climate change and pollution, but we should try to protect nature’s smells while we still can.  Will Rice suggests that legislation can help.  The Marine Mammal Protection Act helped seals make a comeback in Cape Cod.  Their return has restored their scent along the beach, a scent Thoreau smelled when he walked up the Cape Cod coast.  And while that smell disappeared for a long time, it has now happily rebounded.

So let’s be scent-sible and protect the natural scents that still surround us.  As I often say (with no originality whatsoever), “Better late than never.”

They’re My Blue Jeans, and I’ll Wear Them If I Want To

What?  I’m supposed to give up wearing jeans because I’m over 52?

I recently came across a preposterous study conducted by CollectPlus, a UK parcel-delivery service, which asked 2,000 Brits this question:  When should people stop wearing jeans?

Answer:  Age 53.

Even the marketing director at CollectPlus was baffled by the results.  Catherine Wolfe told the Daily Mail, “Denim is such a universal material and, with so many different styles available, it’s a timeless look that people of all ages can pull off.”

The newspaper didn’t disclose such relevant details as the age of the participants in the survey.  Who were these people?  How old were they?  Where in the UK did they live?  To make any sense out of this study, we should know details like these.

What did the participants reveal?  Almost a quarter of them admitted they haven’t yet found their perfect pair, another 29 percent have given up the quest for that perfect pair, and six percent admitted that they’ve been reduced to tears in the search for it.

Once they’ve found their ideal jeans, however, they hold on to them, and 33 percent say they’ll wear them practically anywhere, including the theater or a dinner party.

Do these devoted jeans-wearers really expect to give up their beloved jeans when they turn 53?  I doubt it.

Although my own go-to pants are slim black fabric-blends, my wardrobe also includes some skinny jeans.  I sported a pair last week during a visit to Yosemite National Park. My semi-washed-out jeans were clearly the best choice for Yosemite.  They protected me from insect bites, spilled food and drink, and potentially hazardous falls onto jagged rocks and other obstacles confronting me during my hikes.  (Luckily, I avoided any mishaps.)  When I hiked alongside Yosemite Falls, one of the park’s spectacular waterfalls, its watery mist hit my clothes, but my jeans’ cotton fabric dried quickly in the mountain air.  And I had pockets galore in which to stash any small items I needed en route.

In short, they were perfect.  Why would I ever want to abandon them?

Here in San Francisco, we treasure the legacy of blue jeans, thanks to Levi Strauss and the jeans empire he and his partner created in 1871 (they patented their design in 1873).  The Levis Strauss Company is still a big presence in the city, and Levi’s descendants are among the Bay Area’s most prominent philanthropists and civic leaders.

You may be surprised to learn that the Levi’s company maintains a vast collection of historic jeans in its San Francisco archives. And to celebrate the 144th birthday of blue jeans this year, Levi’s hosted a bunch of special events around town, including the launch of their first-ever skinny 501s for men and women.

Give up my skinny jeans?  Never.  And I think at least a few other over-50s agree.  Last week, I watched singer-songwriter Paul Simon perform on The Late Show with Stephen Colbert.  Simon, who’s 75, was wearing a pair of skinny jeans that looked a lot like mine.

Bravo, Paul!  It’s great to see you still singing, still writing new songs to sing, and still wearing skinny jeans.  “Hello darkness, my old friend?”  Well, maybe.  If they’re dark blue skinny jeans, that is.

 

 

Take a hike

The lure of “the gym” has always escaped me. I’ve joined a few fitness centers in my day, but I consistently end up abandoning the gym and resorting to my preferred route to fitness: walking. Whenever possible, I walk and hike in the great outdoors.

A host of recent studies has validated my faith in the benefits of walking. And some of these benefits may surprise you.

First, being active is better for your health. Duh. We’ve all suspected that for a long time. But here’s a new finding: sitting may be the real problem. Studies show that the more you sit, the greater your risk for health problems. In a study of more than two thousand adults ages 60 and older, every additional hour a day spent sitting was linked to a 50 percent greater risk of disability. Even those who got some exercise but were sitting too much were more likely to get dumped in the pool of disabled people.

Dorothy Dunlop and her colleagues at Northwestern’s McCormick School of Engineering and Applied Science concluded that sitting seems to be a separate risk factor. Getting enough exercise is important, but it’s equally important not to be a couch potato the rest of the time. Their study appeared in the Journal of Physical Activity & Health in 2014.

Another study, published in Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, noted something else about prolonged sitting: taking “short walking breaks” at least once an hour may lessen or even prevent some of the adverse effects, especially on the cardiovascular system. When healthy young men sat for 3 hours without moving their legs, endothelial function—the ability of blood vessels to expand and contract—dropped significantly from the very beginning. But when they broke up their sitting time with slow 5-minute walks every 30 or 60 minutes, endothelial function did not decline.

Here’s another benefit: Exercise, including walking, can keep you from feeling depressed. A British study, reported in JAMA Psychiatry, followed over 11,000 people (initially in their early 20s) for more than 25 years. It found that the more physically active they were, the less likely they were to have symptoms of depression. For example, sedentary people who started exercising 3 times a week reduced their risk of depression 5 years later by almost 20 percent. The researchers concluded that being active “can prevent and alleviate depressive symptoms in adulthood.”

Ready for one more reason to walk? A study described in The Wall Street Journal in 2014 found that walking can significantly increase creativity. This is a brand new finding. In the past, studies have shown that after exercise, people usually perform better on tests of memory and the ability to make decisions and organize thoughts. Exercise has also been linked anecdotally to creativity: writers and artists have said for centuries that their best ideas have come during a walk. But now science supports that link.

Researchers at Stanford University, led by Dr. Marily Oppezzo, decided to test the notion that walking can inspire creativity. They gathered a group of students in a deliberately unadorned room equipped with nothing more than a desk and a treadmill. The students were asked to sit and complete “tests of creativity,” like quickly coming up with alternative uses for common objects, e.g., a button. Facing a blank wall, the students then walked on the treadmill at an easy pace, repeating the creativity tests as they walked. Result: creativity increased when the students walked. Most came up with about 60 percent more “novel and appropriate” uses for the objects.

Dr. Oppezzo then tested whether these effects lingered. The students repeated the test when they sat down after their walk on the treadmill. Again, walking markedly improved their ability to generate creative ideas, even when they had stopped walking. They continued to produce more and better ideas than they had before their walk.

When Dr. Oppezzo moved the experiment outdoors, the findings surprised her. The students who walked outside did come up with more creative ideas than when they sat, either inside or outside, but walking outside did not lead to more creativity than walking inside on the treadmill. She concluded that “it’s the walking that matters.”

So a brief stroll apparently leads to greater creativity. But the reasons for it are unclear. According to Dr. Oppezzo, “It may be that walking improves mood,” and creativity blooms more easily when one is happier. The study appeared in The Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition in 2014.

In truth, I don’t need these studies to convince me to keep walking. It helps that I live in San Francisco, where the climate allows me to walk outside almost every day. Walking is much more challenging when you confront the snow and ice that used to accompany my walks in and around Chicago. So I’m not surprised that walkers in colder climes often resort to exercising indoors.

It also helps that San Francisco has recently been voted the second most walkable city in America. According to Walk Score, an organization that ranks the “walkability” of 2,500 cities in the U.S., SF placed just behind New York City as the most walkable major American city.

SF’s high score is especially impressive in light of the city’s hills. Although I avoid the steepest routes, I actually welcome a slight incline because it adds to my aerobic workout. Why use a Stairmaster in a gloomy gym when I can climb uphill enveloped in sunshine and cool ocean breezes?

But whether you walk indoors or out, do remember to walk! You’ll assuredly benefit health-wise. And you just may enhance your creativity quotient. Someday you may even find yourself writing a blog like this one.