Tag Archives: 1940s

Ignoring history

As 21st-century Americans, we have a lot of our own history to look back on.  We should also look back at important events in world history.  Ignoring that history can create a troubling scenario.

I’m especially troubled by people who have ignored the reality of world history during the 20th century.  Especially people who ignore what happened to Europe during the 1930s and 1940s and make declarations like “Hitler was right.”

The recent upsurge in antisemitism, probably related to actions taken by Israel’s current government, may play a role.  But applauding the actions of a monster like Hitler totally ignores what really happened.

Hitler’s Nazi government transformed most of Europe, both before and during World War II, evoking almost incredible depths of cruelty and destruction.  The Holocaust systematically killed millions of European Jews in an overwhelmingly evil plan that still shocks us today.  But we should remember that the Holocaust was only part of the cruel and destructive Nazi regime.  Hitler wasn’t just about killing Jews.  He went on to kill millions of people in every occupied country in Europe, as well as tens of thousands killed in the London blitz.  And we should add to this number the estimated 21 to 25 million members of the military killed in combat during World War II.  Tens of millions more were wounded.

One early example of the damage done to so much of Europe appeared on my TV the other night.  Searching for something to watch, I clicked on Netflix, which offered me the chance to see a 2016 film, “Anthropoid.”  The Netflix blurb said that the film involved Czech patriots opposed to the Nazis, and it starred engaging actors like Cillian Murphy and Jamie Dornan.  I decided to take a chance on it.

As the film begins, the audience learns about the Munich Agreement, the attempted appeasement of Hitler in September 1938, which allowed the Nazis to take over much of a hitherto-independent country, Czechoslovakia, without firing a shot. The audience can watch newsreel coverage of British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain waving the piece of paper that allowed that to happen. The film goes on to feature seven brave Czechs who, following the orders of the Czech resistance based in London, parachuted into their home country to fight the Nazis who had taken over Czechoslovakia. 

The film focuses on two of these parachutists, played by Murphy and Dornan, who were given the mission called “Anthropoid” to assassinate Nazi General Reinhard Heydrich.  Heydrich, the top Nazi in Prague, ran a ruthless and brutal campaign against Czechs who resisted the Nazis.

In the film, these two loyal Czechs (named Jan and Josef) endure tremendous stress as they prepare for their task.  Along with brave women and men living in Prague who help them, they finally succeed at assassinating Heydrich.  The reprisals happen immediately.

While Jan and Josef are hunted, many others in the resistance are rounded up and massacred.  The film reveals that about 5,000 Czechs were killed in retaliation.  An entire village, Lidice, was wiped out.

I won’t reveal what ultimately happens to Jan and Josef and the other parachutists.  But I’ll add that I found much of the film almost unwatchable.  Because it clearly demonstrates the cruelty of the Nazi regime under Hitler, some scenes were terribly difficult to watch. I fast-forwarded through these scenes as well as I could. (Not easy to do with streaming.)

I’ve visited Prague myself, and I know that the Jewish population there was devastated by the Nazis.  But there is no mention of Jews throughout this film. Its focus is on the cruelty suffered by the brave Czech patriots whose story it tells.

This film is a potent reminder of recent world history. If we don’t ignore this history, and we honestly look at what happened to Europe under the Nazis, we can see how much of Europe, including Germany itself, was almost irreparably damaged.  Let’s remember that local populations were terrified by their Nazi occupiers, with only a few people brave enough to fight in the resistance–at least until V-E Day in April 1945, when the Allies finally freed Europe from Nazi cruelty.

The vivid story told in “Anthropoid” makes clear how vital it is to pay attention to history. Its story is a cautionary tale, serving as a warning for us today.  If we look back at the ruthless pursuit of cruelty in the Nazi era, we can learn to watch for signs of cruelty as they occur in our own time.  These signs are appearing in our country more and more frequently.  And as author Timothy Snyder writes in On Tyranny: “We are no wiser than the Europeans who saw democracy yield to…Nazism…. Our one advantage is that we might learn from their experience.”

And we must, like the Czech patriots in “Anthropoid,” screw up our courage and oppose them.  At the ballot box if nowhere else.

SusanLindaBarbaraCarolJudyNancy

When I was growing up, about 80 percent of the girls I knew shared one of these six names:

Susan

Linda

Barbara

Carol(e)

Judy

Nancy

I was one of the perhaps hundreds of thousands of women in my generation named Susan.  In 1945, it ranked as the #10 girls’ name in the U.S.  By 1957, it was even more popular, ranking #2.

Why did so many of us share the same names?

I trace their popularity to something that seemed to permeate the consciousness of our parents:  The bright lights of Hollywood.

When we were born, many of our parents were still emerging from the shadows cast by World War II and the financial setbacks of the Great Depression.  Our parents may have already become financially successful or they may have been continuing their attempt to achieve financial success.  Either way, they hoped for a bright future for their darling daughters.  Hollywood seemed like a glittering site where they could find names to bestow on them.

In my own case (and that of the throngs of other Susans), I blame Susan Hayward.  By 1940, Susan Hayward had begun to earn a place for herself in Hollywood.  She went on to star in a series of box-office hits during the 1940s and ‘50s.  In most of her roles, she was a notable standout among the film actresses of her day—courageous, smart, and fiercely independent, frequently paired with some of Hollywood’s top male stars.  Her flaming red hair and other appealing features helped bolster her status as a Hollywood star.

What about the other names?  The reliance on Hollywood’s women stars is equally clear when we consider at least four of the other names.

Linda:  Hollywood was fascinated with Linda Darnell, and she was featured in a wide range of films during the 1940s and ‘50s.  The Mark of Zorro (1940) was her first opportunity to star with leading man Tyrone Power, with whom she was paired in a number of films.  Coincidentally, Tyrone Power later married Linda Christian, another Hollywood star during the ‘40s and ‘50s.

Barbara:  One of Hollywood’s megastars, Barbara Stanwyck, starred in 85 films, including many during the 1940s and ‘50s.  She was admired for her roles as a strong leading woman in films like Double Indemnity (1944).   Incidentally, Ruth Handler created the Barbie doll in 1959, probably influenced by the popularity of the name Barbara during the ‘40s and ‘50s.

Carol(e):  Carole Lombard, a huge star in the 1930s, was originally named Carol but was once mistakenly credited as Carole, and she adopted that spelling because she decided she liked it.  Her popularity zoomed until a plane crash in 1942 ended her life as well as her radiant career.  Her husband, Hollywood leading man Clark Gable, remarried twice but reportedly never got over Carole’s death.

Judy:  The name Judy was undoubtedly inspired by Hollywood legend Judy Garland.  Need I say more?

Nancy:  It’s harder to track any film stars named Nancy.  Nancy Davis, who married Ronald Reagan, didn’t begin making movies until the late ‘40s and she never became a big star.  Other Nancys in Hollywood films during the ‘40s and ‘50s were fairly unknown actresses who never achieved box-office success.  Maybe they were among the countless women who rejected the Hollywood casting couch and fell into oblivion as a result.  Parents may have chosen the name Nancy simply because they liked the good vibe the name Nancy offered, in part due to the popularity of the Nancy Drew books.  As a teenage sleuth, Nancy Drew gave off a great vibe.  A total of 175 books featuring her began publishing in 1930 and continued for decades.

Among my cohorts, many other girls’ names had their moment in the sun:  Karen, Julie, Natalie, Ann/Anne, Janice, Marcia/Marsha, Elizabeth (in one form or another), and Katherine (ditto).  But they couldn’t compete with the six favorites.

Boys’ names pretty much stuck to more traditional favorites. Most popular from the 1940s through the 1960s were James, Robert, John, William, and Richard, with Michael and David gaining strength in the ‘60s.

Both boys’ and girls’ names had changed radically by 2000.  Boys were most often named Jacob, Joshua, and Matthew.  Girls’ favored names were Emily, Hannah, and Madison.

Some parents began using names derived from pop culture, especially TV series (supplanting Hollywood films)–names like Phoebe in “Friends.”

As for Susan, it’s plunged in popularity since its heyday, when it ranked #2.  By 2023, it had fallen to #1708.  

Nobody seems to name a daughter Susan anymore. 

But with the recent revival of venerable names like Amelia, Evelyn, Charlotte, and Olivia, who knows?  Maybe Susan will live again!