Tag Archives: mental-health

“Don’t talk to strangers”

Remember how, when you were a kid, your parents always told you: “Don’t talk to strangers.”  Was that good advice?

For kids, that has always been good advice.  When kids talk to strangers, they can get into all kinds of trouble.  But what about adults?

The Wall Street Journal has just highlighted a study that endorses talking to strangers.  When you’re an adult, that is.

Writer Elizabeth Bernstein noted some recently published research demonstrating that people actually like talking to strangers.  According to a study conducted by Gillian Sandstrom, a professor at the University of Sussex, talking with strangers can be a good thing.  “Small talk” with people you don’t know can actually soothe or support us when no one else is around.  Even conversations about boring topics, like the weather, can be more enjoyable than most of us expect.  They can boost our mood and help “broaden our perspective.”

How?

Because humans have a fundamental need to feel valued and part of a community, our mental and physical health can suffer when no one in our lives meet that need.  If we try talking to strangers, we may feel connected, putting us in a better mood.  It can also expose us to new information, about ourselves and about others.

Further, if you’re troubled by something in your life, it can be surprisingly helpful to talk to someone you don’t know.  Strangers can see things differently and be more objective.

According to Sandstrom’s research, we can change how we see other people and the world around us, encouraging us to be more trusting and increasing our perception that other people are kind and good.

Problem:  In 2005, researchers started tracking how many words people speak each day.  We are now speaking less—an average of 338 fewer words a day, adding up to about 120,000 fewer words a year.

Why?  Probably because we do so much today through a screen, ordering everything from coffee to shoes to medical prescriptions.  We get many of our choices delivered to us instead of getting them in a store or restaurant.  More people are also working from home, so they have fewer opportunities to talk to colleagues. This means fewer chances to share a laugh or get a recommendation or simply chat with other humans.

A lack of this kind of chitchat can mean a dearth of relationships that could turn into friendships or even romances.

Don’t worry about “boring” other people.  Research shows that even when people talk about boring topics, they enjoy the conversation anyway.  It’s the sharing and listening and being heard that make them feel better.

If you’re reluctant to talk to strangers, writer Bernstein promotes using an acronym that helps you get started:  QUICK.  QU stands for “question.”  You can ask someone “How’s it going?” or “Is there a good restaurant nearby?” 

IC stands for “in common.”  The weather is a topic we all have in common.  Talking about it is a good starting point.  And “K” stands for “kindness.”  You can try complimenting someone.  It gives you a reason to get some chitchat going.  (I hasten to advise you to stick to innocuous compliments.  Don’t get too personal.  Choose a compliment on something like a jacket or a sweater.) 

If the other person isn’t “willing to engage,” Bernstein recommends trying to talk to someone else.  I agree.  As A.I. encroaches further and further into our lives, human interaction is more important than ever.

I’m happy to admit that I often try to strike up conversations with strangers when I’m waiting in a line or sitting in an MD’s waiting room.  It can help pass the time, and it usually turns out well.

You might want to try it yourself sometime. 

By the way, “How’s it going?”

Cynicism can be bad for your health

Hey, it’s easy to be cynical these days. 

We’re faced with lie-spouting politicians threatening democratic rule in our country.  We’re confronted by incompetent jerks who make countless mistakes, or even try to scam us, at almost any business we patronize.  And I can’t forget the maniac drivers who weave from lane to lane at illegally high speeds, threatening to kill us every time we’re near them on the freeway. 

But hold on a minute.  A social scientist/author says that having a cynical worldview isn’t such a great idea.  Jamil Zaki wants you to know that having a cynical worldview may have a negative effect on your health. 

In his new book, “Hope for Cynics:  The Surprising Science of Human Goodness,” Zaki concedes that being a cynic can make us feel safer and smarter than the selfish, greedy, and dishonest people in our midst.  But his research at Stanford (where he’s the director of its Social Neuroscience Lab) suggests that it’s much better to become “hopeful skeptics.”  In other words, it’s okay to be critical of troublemakers, but you should also recognize how kind and generous most people really are.

What’s at play here?  Well, we tend to pay more attention to negative events than to positive ones.  This “negativity bias” leads you to remember an occasional driver who cuts you off in traffic while you ignore the countless drivers who are obeying the rules of the road.  Zaki says we should take 15 minutes out of our day and pay attention to the kindness all around us instead of the rudeness you encounter now and then.

Similarly, he recommends that we spread “positive gossip,” pointing out good deeds and kind behavior instead of doing the opposite–spreading mean-spirited gossip about people we dislike.

What’s the benefit of avoiding cynical thought?  You’ll probably feel better about humankind, and that will probably lead to better health.  According to Zaki, the cynical among us are more likely to suffer from depression, heart disease, and feeling burned out.

In the midst of a heated campaign for mayor in San Francisco, one candidate has asked voters to end “the era of cynicism.”  He’s a political novice who has spent much of his personal fortune on philanthropic efforts aimed at improving life in our city, and he’s angry that his opponents have belittled those efforts.  I don’t blame him one bit.  Even though his philanthropy hasn’t always met its goals, the other candidates shouldn’t stoop to cynical bashing.  Instead of criticizing him (as they did in a recent televised debate), they could be praising his attempts to make life better. They could adopt a positive approach and advocate their own ideas for achieving worthwhile goals for our city.  Sadly, the negativity hurled during the debate was so awful that I immediately stopped watching.

As The New York Times book review of Zaki’s book has warned: “Don’t Fall into the ‘Cynicism Trap.”  I don’t plan to, and I hope you won’t either.  Let’s aim for hopeful skepticism.  If we avoid cynicism and instead pay more attention to the kindness around us, we just might feel better.